Facebook Twitter (X) Instagram Somali Magazine - People's Magazine
New findings from a groundbreaking clinical trial reveal that eating minimally processed, home‑cooked meals leads to significantly more weight loss than consuming ultra‑processed foods—even when both diets are designed to match national guidelines for calories, fiber, sugar, fat, and protein.
In the eight‑week trial led by University College London, participants first followed a diet of minimally processed meals—think veggie‑rich breakfasts and spaghetti bolognese made from scratch—and then switched to a diet of packaged, pre‑prepared ultra‑processed foods like microwaveable lasagna and snack bars. Despite being allowed to eat freely on both diets, those eating whole, minimal‑processing meals lost twice as much weight. On average, they shed about 2 percent of their body weight in just two months, compared to 1 percent under the ultra‑processed regimen.
More strikingly, the minimally processed group naturally consumed fewer calories—without even counting them—and reported greater control over cravings. They experienced noticeably fewer salty or sweet urges and found it easier to resist personal indulgences. Early projections from the researchers suggest that, if maintained over a year, these habits could result in a weight loss equivalent to 13 percent of body weight for men, and 9 percent for women.
These results reinforce earlier controlled experiments showing that diets high in ultra‑processed foods lead people to overeat. In those metabolic studies, participants consumed about 500 extra calories per day on ultra‑processed meals compared to minimally processed diets, resulting in measurable weight gain—even when the macronutrient content was identical.
Beyond weight, extensive epidemiological evidence connects ultra‑processed food consumption with a host of health risks. Meta‑analyses tracking hundreds of thousands of people across decades show that every 10 percent increase in calories from ultra‑processed foods is associated with roughly a 3 percent rise in the risk of premature death—between ages 30 and 69. Similar dose‑dependent links exist for obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, mental health disorders, and multiple forms of cancer.
This growing research underscores that food processing matters—not just nutrients alone. Ultra‑processed foods are engineered to be hyper‑palatable, combining high sugar, salt, and fat content with additives to enhance taste and texture. They tend to demand minimal effort to eat, bypassing natural hunger and satiety signals in the brain. As a result, they promote overeating and disrupt appetite regulation.
Interestingly, not all ultra‑processed foods pose equal risk. Some plant‑based meat alternatives—like certain burgers made to mimic beef—can support weight loss when used to replace red meat. In one study, individuals who switched to plant‑based products lost one to three pounds within two months while retaining similar protein intake and actually consuming more fiber and less saturated fat. Despite their “ultra‑processed” classification, these products may still offer a step toward healthier, planet‑friendly diets if consumed thoughtfully and sparingly.
Still, the overall message is clear: choosing whole, home‑cooked meals made from minimally processed ingredients offers major health advantages—even when following standard dietary guidelines. People naturally eat less, feel fuller, and lose more fat and body weight.